December 1, 2012
|
Article
Change apparently is coming to the auditor’s report, but views vary over the appropriate content and structure for reports, and particularly over the issue of “auditor commentary.” The question of appropriate content and structure for the auditor’s report was the subject of an International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) round-table meeting in New York in September.
|
|
|
December 1, 2012
|
Article
Change apparently is coming to the auditor’s report, but views vary over the appropriate content and structure for reports, and particularly over the issue of “auditor commentary.” The question of appropriate content and structure for the auditor’s report was the subject of an International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) round-table meeting in New York in September.
|
|
|
December 1, 2012
|
Article
Change apparently is coming to the auditor’s report, but views vary over the appropriate content and structure for reports, and particularly over the issue of “auditor commentary.” The question of appropriate content and structure for the auditor’s report was the subject of an International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) round-table meeting in New York in September.
|
|
|
November 1, 2012
|
Article
The AICPA’s Auditing Standards Board (ASB) issued Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) No. 126, The Auditor's Consideration of an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (Redrafted), as a result of its Clarity Project to supersede SAS No.
|
|
|
November 1, 2012
|
Article
The AICPA’s Auditing Standards Board (ASB) issued Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) No. 126, The Auditor's Consideration of an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (Redrafted), as a result of its Clarity Project to supersede SAS No.
|
|
|
November 1, 2012
|
Article
The AICPA’s Auditing Standards Board (ASB) issued Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) No. 126, The Auditor's Consideration of an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (Redrafted), as a result of its Clarity Project to supersede SAS No.
|
|
|
May 1, 2012
|
BY
Ahava Goldman and Amanda Black, CPA
|
Article
With audit busy season ending, it’s time to start preparing for the transition to the clarified standards, which are effective for calendar year 2012 audits. A smooth transition requires information, education, and training. Take these steps to prepare for the clarified standards and minimize the transition’s effect on your firm and clients: Familiarize yourself with the clarified standards, including the application material, appendices, and exhibits.
|
|
|
May 1, 2012
|
BY
Ahava Goldman and Amanda Black, CPA
|
Article
With audit busy season ending, it’s time to start preparing for the transition to the clarified standards, which are effective for calendar year 2012 audits. A smooth transition requires information, education, and training. Take these steps to prepare for the clarified standards and minimize the transition’s effect on your firm and clients: Familiarize yourself with the clarified standards, including the application material, appendices, and exhibits.
|
|
|
May 1, 2012
|
BY
Ahava Goldman and Amanda Black, CPA
|
Article
With audit busy season ending, it’s time to start preparing for the transition to the clarified standards, which are effective for calendar year 2012 audits. A smooth transition requires information, education, and training. Take these steps to prepare for the clarified standards and minimize the transition’s effect on your firm and clients: Familiarize yourself with the clarified standards, including the application material, appendices, and exhibits.
|
|
|
March 28, 2012
|
BY
Ken Tysiac
|
Article
Members of Congress asked pointed questions of PCAOB Chairman James Doty on Wednesday as the hot topic of mandatory audit firm rotation was debated during a wide-ranging discussion of accounting and auditing issues in front of a House subcommittee. Rep. Scott Garrett, R-N.J., the chairman of the House Subcommittee on Capital Markets and Government Sponsored Enterprises, opened the hearing by stating his concern that the PCAOB was overstepping its mandate by considering the issue of mandatory audit firm rotation.
|